Re: libc6 vs libc6.1
On Sat, Jan 24, 1998 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Juan Cespedes wrote:
> Why does debian-alpha use `libc6.1' instead of `libc6'? When
> I saw it, I thought it could be because there are two different,
> incompatible versions of glibc for Alpha, but I think that is not the
Well, no one answers me. Does it mean that `libc6.1' isn't
needed, and it should be changed?
I may submit a bug report against the glibc package: I think
the glibc soname for alpha can be changed safely from libc6.1 to libc6
without breaking anything.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .