Re: libc6 vs libc6.1
On Wednesday, 28 Jan, Juan Cespedes wrote:
> I may submit a bug report against the glibc package: I think
> the glibc soname for alpha can be changed safely from libc6.1 to libc6
> without breaking anything.
Changing the soname will break binary compatibility between Debian and
non-Debian Alpha systems, because 6.1 is the official soname for glibc2
on Alpha. When glibc2 is built off the normal, unpatched GNU source
tree on Linux/Alpha, it is assigned 6.1.
According to the Debian policy, the package name should reflect the
soname exactly, so it must remain libc6.1.
That's my understanding of the situation.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .