Re: [RFH] Polyorb packaging
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Le 14/05/2012 14:18, Xavier Grave a écrit :
> Le 14/05/2012 12:56, Ludovic Brenta a écrit :
>> Xavier Grave writes:
>>> Modifying the python part to get error on test failure seems to involve
>>> modifying gnatpython MainLoop also since the main loop catch an exit
>>> exception. So it's not, IMHO, a straightforward action.
>>>
>>> PolyORB can't be provided without CORBA since the COS [1] needs CORBA
>>> and the DSA needs the Cos Naming Services
>>>
>>> So either we go with still a few tests failure (removed or not from the
>>> testsuite), either we drop polyorb support (and narval with the bath water).
>
>> Does the COS naming service require that all CORBA tests pass? That would
>> surprise me. So, assuming that the failing tests do not affect the naming
>> service, it seems the best strategy is:
>
>> 1 upload with CORBA known to be broken but the COS Naming Service and DSA
>> working. This can be achieved by either disabling the failing CORBA
>> tests or by allowing them to fail in a way that does not prevent the
>> package from building.
>
>> 2 upload narval
>
>> 3 if time permits, fix the CORBA tests.
>
>> If step 1 requires changing python-gnatpython, and if that change is too
>> difficult or time consuming for you, consider disabling the failing tests
>> altogether.
>
>
> Step 1 is already OK. I'll upload a version to mentors in the afternoon.
I have found a way to have a test suite returning a non zero value on
error. This is the reason I postponed the upload to mentors.
I'll upload as soon as possible.
xavier
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=kYzr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: