Re: [RFH] Polyorb packaging
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Le 06/05/2012 18:36, Reto Buerki a écrit :
> Hi Xavier
>
> On 05/05/2012 10:16 PM, Xavier Grave wrote:
>> My main problem is that the following tests in the testsuite are not
>> running as expected (see the attached polyorb_2.8~20110207-1_amd64.build
>> file) :
>> always_fail CORBA_PORTABLEINTERCEPTOR_1 SHUTDOWN_1 ALL_TYPES_2
>> ALL_TYPES_3 ALL_FUNCTIONS_3 ALL_FUNCTIONS_2
>>
>> Since the problem seems to me mainly related to corba, and I'm not using
>> this part of the lib : I'm launching this RFH to understand why these
>> corba tests are failing.
>
> I'm going to look into it.
Thanks a lot.
>> I also wonder which Debian packages depend on the corba part of polyorb
>> and if we can think about a "DSA only" polyorb package or providing the
>> package as it is removing these tests from the test suite and continue
>> to work in parallel on the solution of this problem.
>
> Currently no other Debian packages depend on the corba part of polyorb.
> Nevertheless, I would prefer to have corba enabled in the next release
> because I put quite a lot of effort into it already.
I'll keep that in mind.
> One thing that bothers me is that the build continues even though some
> tests are failing. 'make testsuite' should return non-zero exit status
> when tests fail.
I have already put my nose in the testsuite.py python code (not easy for
me :) ), I'll try to make it exit to non zero when a test fail.
> - reto
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=xXvX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: