On 10/13/13 14:07, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> Good idea. How about deciding on a standard name: README.A11Y-team or >> README.packaging or README.testing? > > README.testing seems better to me. Or even README.regression_testing? >> My guess would be this README file only needs to be in the debian/ tree >> in the source package, and does not need to go in any of the binary >> packages, right? > > I'd say it should go into a binary package too. Why? And then, in which one(s)? The "main" package, e.g. the one most likely to be run by the user? Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature