Re: Lynx and Unicode
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> writes:
> Samuel Thibault, le Fri 02 May 2008 14:13:17 +0100, a écrit :
>> Mario Lang, le Fri 02 May 2008 15:03:16 +0200, a écrit :
>> > > Btw, I was thinking about maybe adding an option to setfont, that would
>> > > automatically extend the loaded 256-char font with braille patterns.
>> > > That would avoid having to write lat2brl, lat4brl, lat7brl, etc.
>> >
>> > or lat1brl, which is what I'd like to use.
>> > This also answers my question regarding duplicity. Yes, I think
>> > extending setfont (or whatever is actually non-deprecated these days)
>> > would make sense, since duplicating all the existing fonts
>> > seems like very bad and error-prone.
>>
>> Maybe it could be made more generic by permitting to give two 256
>> character fonts. That may be useful for people who often use two very
>> different scripts.
>
> Actually it is _already_ implemented :)
>
> I have added brl-{08,10,12,14,16} files to the linux-brl-console, and
> you can simply set
>
> CONSOLE_FONT="lat9w-08 brl-08"
>
> in /etc/kbd/config!
That sounds like something. Pardon my ignorance, but how
does this work together with the unimap? Will the fonts be mapped
correctly back, or are they just set for display?
--
CYa,
⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ | Debian Developer <URL:http://debian.org/>
.''`. | Get my public key via finger mlang/key@db.debian.org
: :' : | 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44
`. `'
`- <URL:http://delysid.org/> <URL:http://www.staff.tugraz.at/mlang/>
Reply to: