Re: [buildd] Vivaldi & Elgar sbuild ready, Arrakis next
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 02:30:49PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dixit:
> >To make this a bit more practical and directly useful:
> Great, thanks! I will mark all those as failed which I have
> in my list as FTBFS. What about those where I have patches
> in unreleased?
Eh. If they're built and uploaded, they *should* show as "installed". If
they're not built yet, just take them for building, so no buildd tries
to build them.
> Looks like --no-build is for them?
No, that means we don't ever want to build them, and isn't reset after a
new upload. Please don't use that except for packages that are
architecture-specific to other architectures.
Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you
to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and
save on postage.