[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Updating w.d.o/{intro/organization#distribution,ports/}



If there's a decent walkthrough on getting the 68k bootloader running
thru debian....I have a A4000 and a Centris 610 that I could certainly
setup to help out. I've ran Linuxes of all flavors on x86 for a long
time, and I've followed this list for a few years now. I'd like to
help contribute but want up-to-date information on how to get
booted(EMILIE bootloader for example).

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de> wrote:
> schmitz dixit:
>
>> So it looks like we're looking for fresh volunteers - any more takers? Would
>> you be willing to give new hands a few hints to get started, Thorsten?
>
> Some hints, sure. But right now we need old hands that manage
> to set up a real buildd. I’ve been ill for a week now, and my
> hacking time in general is seriously cut short, so things may
> no longer work (packages like texlive, git, etc. become unin-
> stallable quickly due to arch:all versioned deps on arch:any)
> but there’s always an installable state in my repo.
>
> So, everyone who ever ran a buildd (atari, amiga, mac68k, and
> zlin*/aranym), please please please get them booted, running,
> up to date and building packages. Then I might divert time in
> things like keeping our patches in src:gcc-4.6 again.
>
> Also, would the real m68k porters please stand up (Wouter did
> ask for something to do other than DPL recently…)?
>
> As for the usefulness of real hardware, I disagree. Right now
> it’s crucial to get things working on that. I think I’ve seen
> quite a number of emulation bugs recently.
>
> Finally, there’s an ongoing fight of using debbugs for packa-
> ges in unreleased, such as the m68k bootloaders. Right now it
> doesn’t look well. We might need to use something like Launch-
> pad for them, which sucks (especially for version tracking as
> older versions of these packages were in unstable – and newer
> will hopefully be, when m68k joins proper Debian again), plus
> it would mean a split and users would be confused, which bugs
> to report where. (On the other hand, I could probably get the
> Launchpad side set up. Got connections.)
>
> bye,
> //mirabilos
> --
> 08:05⎜<XTaran:#grml> mika: Does grml have an tool to read Apple
>     ⎜    System Log (asl) files? :)
> 08:08⎜<ft:#grml> yeah. /bin/rm. ;)       08:09⎜<mrud:#grml> hexdump -C
> 08:31⎜<XTaran:#grml> ft, mrud: *g*
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1204181522280.15195@herc.mirbsd.org">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1204181522280.15195@herc.mirbsd.org
>


Reply to: