Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
On Fri, October 22, 2010 4:48 am, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Yes, I'll just assume people use Debian provided kernels though,
> everything else is SOL (even if "traditionally" m68k kernels have
> been built outside of packaging, or so I read recently),
When I was maintaining kernels (for d-i) they were always built from
packaging, although not always on a buildd. I preferred to cross-compile
so I could test the kernel in a timely manner before I uploaded.
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<stephen@marenka.net>
Reply to:
- References:
- gcc done, eglibc problem
- From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
- From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
- From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
- Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
- From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
- Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
- From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
- From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
- Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
- From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
- From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
- Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
- From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
- From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
- Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
- From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>