Re: gcc done, eglibc problem

To: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
Cc: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:59:43 +1100 (EST)
Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.OSX.2.00.1010211433100.280@localhost>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] alpine.OSX.2.00.1010211318300.280@localhost>
References: <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1010201415030.32050@herc.mirbsd.org> <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1010201421480.32050@herc.mirbsd.org> <[🔎] alpine.OSX.2.00.1010211318300.280@localhost>

On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, I wrote:

> ...You want:
> 
> libc_MIN_KERNEL_SUPPORTED = 2.6.32

While I think this is the best choice, it may not actually work...

http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2009/11/msg00003.html

I guess we can cross that bridge when we come to it.

Finn

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>

References:
- gcc done, eglibc problem
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
  - From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
Next by Date: Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
Previous by thread: Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
Next by thread: Re: gcc done, eglibc problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread