On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:15:07AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > Thats all I did, as long as I remembered not to include the patch that > > > > should never be included... it breaks the whole build in really > > > > interesting > > > > > > Yes, the patch that must not be. > > > > Is that the patch that must not be named as well? Otherwise, maybe Geert could > > add an annotation like 'this is to break Debian kernel builds' so novices know > > what to expect :-) > > The one that will be called m68k-PRIVATE-m68k-changes.diff soon? The problem patch is 133-arch.diff because of the localversion thing I think. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature