[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [patch 3/2] m68k: Atari EtherNAT - add writew_be for data push



On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:16:16AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 04:09:47PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Those patches are *not* in -8 for sid. I guess I'll have to make
> > >> another run at the patch queue. (Unless cts wakes back up or someone
> > >> else wants to be kernel patch dude. Hint, Hint. ;)
> 
> Sorry, I am quite happy you doing it ;-)
> Also, I currently don't have a fast machine with sufficient space for
> cross-compiling.

Excuses, excuses.... ;)

> > > I'd like to have a more streamlined way of syncing Geert's patch queue - 
> > > can git or rsync be used for that, Geert?
> > 
> > I'm getting it down to a repeatable art form, if not a science. Right
> > now I just download everything from Geert's quilt file and rewrite it 
> > as a debian series file. Usually this works okay, but I have to remember
> > to use the right set of patches for the right kernel. It's certainly not
> > an elegant procedure. :)
> 
> Thats all I did, as long as I remembered not to include the patch that
> should never be included... it breaks the whole build in really interesting

Yes, the patch that must not be.

> ways otherwise. It would be great if Geert submitted his patches directly to
> the debian-kernel svn, since he is the one who knows best which patches go

Sounds like a dream world to me.

> in. Then you'd only have to take care of the experimental patches, updating
> the config, fixing the builds, trying to keep up with the ever changing build
> system, just the little things ;-)

I can't keep up when it's fairly static. :)

Peace,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<stephen@marenka.net>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: