Re: Buildds configuration and admins
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:20:48AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > I don't really mind one way or the other though it would be great if
> > oldstable(-security) was tracked more closely...
> For this, we would reverse the order of dists in the take-from-dists
> variable, and that's the case at least on q650. Using that on crest would
> keep it from building unstable for as long as anything security related
> needs to be built. Not good in a crunch.
> On second thought - the only thing that kept me from running a
> stable/oldstable buildd on hobbes was disk space. I replaced a flaky disk
> by a bigger one anyway so I'll probably reactivate security there. For the
> next two weeks, that is :-)
I meant to be tracked more as buildd maintainers acting appropriately
for failed builds and looking into fixing these as packages in a stable
release should not be unbuildable in the usual case...