Re: new boot-floppies
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 02:20:00AM +0100, Thomas Sjölin wrote:
> That didn't help much for me. To make the installation of modules work I had
> to copy everything from /target/lib/modules/2.2.10/ to /lib/modules/2.2.10/
from /target/lib to /lib? Hmm, thats the wrong way around... are you sure?
Maybe you copied modules.conf too late? It only worked for me, when I copied
just after selecting the point "drivers+modules" but before actually
installing a module. At this time /etc/modules.conf has just been created
(it does not exist before it seems). There is a warning that one file is
newer than another, ignore that.
I deleted the text file, Andreas (one of you), can you please explain what I
wrote in the letter which was with the CD?
But then I hope this will be fixed soon, since this bug is present for all
architectures at the moment I think.
> Next thing: When I chose to install dmasound it also installed the module
> for soundcard and when I chose lp_mfc it also installed lp_m68k, they at
> least got marked as installed and I couldn't remove them either.
Thats ok, since the modules depend on each other. In fact, its good that
they are loaded automatically, otherewise you'd have to load them yourself
in the correct order... Try "lsmod" as root sometime.
> DHCP worked just fine. However, I'll make a new try without giving the
Cool.
> correct hostname. I did that this time because I've gotten used to. I'll
> try not to the next time to see what happens.
And that is good for what? Well, I dont know about DHCP, Im glad it works
now. Please don't try finding more bugs than necessary ;-)
How do you like the icons, can you seem them properly (do you use newicons?).
Finished. Except modules bug (thats a boot-floppies bug), pmac-fdisk.txt
(thats an ftp bug) and a new kernel-image maybe. I am waiting for the quick
install texts to include them, in case people feel they are still needed.
Christian
Reply to: