On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 23:29 +0200, Herman Robak wrote: > I thought so, too, until I discovered a really annoying quirk in my > new HDV camera: It cuts the sound during tape eject and tape insertion. > The timecode is reset when I switch tape, too. So my long continuous > harddisk recording has two 5-second periods of silence, and non-contiguous > timecode. Ick! Sounds annoying :-/ See my separate post about audio -- if we do audio recording separately, we may be able to live with this sort of thing. There will be plenty of visual cues to sync the sound in post-processing, and there may be other benefits of having sound and audio mixed from separate sources. But this is why I'd like to hear everone's thoughts on a high-level diagram for how the pieces should be connected. For example, what I'm used to for live video work is something like the following: [mic] ----\ [mic] --> [audio mixer] ----\ [mic] ----/ \ \ [cam] -----\ [encoding] --> [streaming] [cam| ---> [video mixer] ----/ [cam] -----/ In this example, sound is mixed from three microphone sources, and video is separately mixed from three cameras. The whole thing is then encoded and finally streamed. (This is greatly simplified -- for instance, I've left out permanent storage, which could be inserted anywhere, before or after the encoding.) But you may have a completely different picture of how this is going to be set up. Please, try to out-ASCII-art me ;) or make a diagram with Dia so we can all see the whole system and resolve missing equipment issues asap. > Harddrives will be roughly the same weight and size, and only 2-3 times > more expensive than DV tape. DV tapes may go out of fashion before IDE > drives do. If we have a TB of disk storage that we can maintain, we are > golden. Do we have it? If not, can we get it and for how long? -- Fabian Fagerholm <fabbe@paniq.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part