Hi Gunnar, On Saturday 14 May 2005 07:55, you wrote: > Hi, Holger, and please excuse me for ignoring this mail for over a > week :) fine with me. We won't need it now - June is sufficient I would say :-) > > I would like to ask, whether it would be possible to assign certain > > people to certain talks in COMAS, so that we, the video team, can make > > use of COMAS. > Yup. > > The functionality does not exist right now, but I think it's quite > easy to add - I have been really tied up, but expect it during the > next week or two. If you don't hear a beep from me by ~thursday, > please bug me again. Great, thanks a lot in advance! :-) > Now, Comas implements scheduling, but we are not currently using that > information for Debconf, as it brings in many questions - we might end > up using it, but I think the model we developed this for is quite > different from Debconf. Of course, scheduling information is vital so > a single person does not need to be on two places at once - We have > tried it before, but you always incur in strange metaphysical > paradoxes. I cannot parse this. I thought/think, you will implement something like this so we can vote on bofs ? What kind of scheduling does comas implement ? > > P.S.: another question about COMAS: does it have an issue/request tracker > > like the BTS or trac ? I'm thinking of using something like this to track > > the administration tasks... could be handy for video as well. > Nope. What kind of tasks are you thinking about? the functionality of request-tracker (package rt, iirc) or trac or the BTS... tasks like: fix dhcp-server, increase maximum object size in squid, post-process the video-recording of talk x or y, etc... Saludos, Holger
Attachment:
pgpc9TXcn3DAm.pgp
Description: PGP signature