also sprach Tassia Camoes Araujo <tassia@debian.org> [2015-08-31 05:18 +0200]:
> Even if Facilities team is largely composed by local people, we
> expected that some experienced members would be there to follow
> the key decisions, at least as advisors.
My counter-proposal has that in form of mentors. The key thing you
are missing is that the DebConf cycle is 2 years, not one. By the
time your "facilities" team is busy doing DCx, DCx+1 is already
engaging with the venue. Hence, my proposal was for a mentor/advisor
to support DCx and another support DCx+1, working in parallel.
Sure, you can unite those people in the "facilities team", but
what additional value do you see in that, which justifies the extra
bureaucratic burden?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
DebConf17 in your country? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf17
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)