Re: [Debconf-team] Notes from reviewing bids. (And questions for teams)
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:55:33PM +0200, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> On 18 February 2014 12:36, Brian Gupta <brian.gupta@brandorr.com> wrote:
> > I touched on this earlier, but please understand, that presenting more
> > than one option seems like it would make the job of those making the
> > decision much more difficult.
> One option to simplify the process would be for all involved to simply
> consider Munich and Heidelberg to be two independent bids with an
> overlapping local team. That will make the choice a bit harder as we
> would have one bid, but it would make each individual bid easier to
> evaluate and compare.
> This would also meant the the choice of the preferred German venue
> would be removed from the local team, unless they withdraw one of the
> options before the final decision meeting.
Alternatively, for the German team to win the bid and retain autonomy on
deciding between Munich and Heidelberg (and be able to play the cities off
each other for better pricings), *both* German venue options would have to
outweigh other the bids. In other words, Munich and Heidelberg would have
to be selected as superior bids to Mechelen and Karlskrona.
--
----------------------------------------------------------
Patty Langasek
harmoney@dodds.net
----------------------------------------------------------
At times, you may end up far away from home; you may not be
sure of where you belong, anymore. But home is always
there... because home is not a place. It's wherever your
passion takes you.
--- J. Michael Straczynski
Reply to: