-=| Moray Allan, Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:09:09PM +0100 |=- > 2011/6/9 Damyan Ivanov <dmn@debian.org>: > > Would it be better if we aim at total pixels used > > Yes. (I'd suggest just approximating it by width ⨉ height.) This is now online and it sort of looks alright, but is not exactly as planned. Here are the size guidelines: Level Width Height Total pixels -------- ----- ------ ------------ Platinum 220 100 22 000 Gold 200 60 12 000 Silver 180 50 9 000 Bronze 140 45 6 300 Steel 100 40 4 000 The problem is that there is a CSS-imposed maximum width of 150 pixels and some wide logos are scaled down as a result. The most obvious case is the canonical logo, the optimal size of wich is 260×34 (8840px² with norm of 9000) and it is scaled to 150×20 (3000px²). If I remove the width limit (locally, with firebug), the sponsor list becomes far too wide. Should we care about this scaling down? I am also wondering if the circle-like logos need a size bump? You know, the area occupied by a 100×100 square is larger than by a circle with diameter of 100. Maybe I am bikeshedding too much :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature