[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debconf-team] sponsorlogos sizes mismatch

-=| Moray Allan, Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:09:09PM +0100 |=-
> 2011/6/9 Damyan Ivanov <dmn@debian.org>:
> > Would it be better if we aim at total pixels used
> Yes.  (I'd suggest just approximating it by width ⨉ height.)

This is now online and it sort of looks alright, but is not exactly as 

Here are the size guidelines:

 Level    Width Height  Total pixels
 -------- ----- ------  ------------
 Platinum   220    100       22 000
 Gold       200     60       12 000
 Silver     180     50        9 000
 Bronze     140     45        6 300
 Steel      100     40        4 000

The problem is that there is a CSS-imposed maximum width of 150 pixels 
and some wide logos are scaled down as a result. The most obvious case 
is the canonical logo, the optimal size of wich is 260×34 (8840px² 
with norm of 9000) and it is scaled to 150×20 (3000px²). If I remove 
the width limit (locally, with firebug), the sponsor list becomes far 
too wide. Should we care about this scaling down?

I am also wondering if the circle-like logos need a size bump? You 
know, the area occupied by a 100×100 square is larger than by a circle 
with diameter of 100.

Maybe I am bikeshedding too much :)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: