Re: [Debconf-team] Open Day talks
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 08:55:25AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 01:56:48PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> > I'd say that Open Day selection people should also be able to mark
> > things as "official", then.
>
> Since several DebConfs I wonder whether we should change this
>
> official / unofficial
>
> branding into
>
> spnsored / not sponsored
>
> to express what we *really* mean. It always confuses people what
> the distinction between official and unofficial means.
+2
Though I agree with the other commenters about finding the right words
to use. (reminds me of the Twisted (I think that was it)
documentation I read that said "code with an open thesaurus). The
main/only benefits to being "Official" are pre-planned, advertised to
attendees slightly more, and videoed, right ?
If there are other similar renamings to do for DC10, we'll make that
happen, too. For one, I wanted to "Independent->Sponsored" at least.
- Richard
--
| Richard Darst - rkd@ - lefschetz: up 145 days, 11:58
| http://rkd.zgib.net - pgp 0xBD356740
| "Ye shall know the truth and -- the truth shall make you free"
Reply to: