Re: revised implementation of the new voting machinery draft
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 01:30:59PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:47:11PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > C should have been excluded from the Schwartz set, because it has
> > > no votes.
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 04:23:02AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Uh, no it shouldn't. Where'd you get that idea from?
> Please express your reasons for saying this.
I've never seen that rule before, it seems unnecessary at best, and
undesirable at worst, and otherwise utterly unexplained. Colour me lost.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Reply to: