Re: Interested in adopting the premake package
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Cameron Hart wrote:
> This is probably more for the benefit of Windows and Mac, The current
> Premake Debian package links against the installed version of Lua
> rather than building the embedded version.
Ick. Its a bit sad that folks have to reinvent packages and
repositories poorly for the sake of those platforms.
> This sounds like the easiest way to proceed to me. Should I open a new
> ITP bug for Premake4 or rename the current Premake ITA bug? Should I
> make any changes to the existing Premake, there are a few bugs logged
> against it although most should be addressed by creating a Premake4
> source. Also should I base a Premake4 source off of the Premake source
> package (e.g. keep the Debian changelog etc.) or start afresh.
If you want to maintain both premake 3 and premake4 for a period of
time then file a new ITP.
If you want to maintain just premake4 then retitle the ITA to ITP: premake4...
Personally I would just leave premake orphaned and remove it after the
wheezy release, so option 2.
Personally I would base premake4 off the premake source package. Just
rename stuff as needed.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: