On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 15:13 +0200, Le_Vert wrote: > > There's still an "aircrack" package in Debian, but you say it's dead > > upstream. Did you persue any effort to have this newer version replace > > the aircrack package or are there reasons to keep both in Debian? > > > > As said, looks good and I hope someone can sponsor you. > > As both aircrack and aircrack-ng can be installed at the same I've > decided to consider them as two different software. What do you think > about it ? To me it's more a question of whether it's useful to keep both. As I understand it, aircrack-ng can be considered as a newer version of aircrack. If it can do the same things as aircrack, plus more or better than aircrack, then I see no sense in keeping aircrack around. I'd keep aircrack around only if it does things that aircrack-ng can't. Thijs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part