[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CC-BY : "clarification letter" ?



On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 07:40:07PM -0500, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> MJ Ray wrote:
> 
> > Under English law, I'm only allowed to say "Daniel wrote ... "
> > and include a chunk of copyrighted material within limited
> > parameters called "fair dealing".

For reference, "fair dealing" mostly just means review, education and
research. There's a range of other limited cases but they aren't very
significant.

> How do you deal with bibliographies?

You call the estate of the person in question and work out a deal. Or
you write it without using any copyrighted stuff.

> What about saying "Ray doesn't like 
> Lessig"?

You'd probably run afoul of our libel laws (this doesn't infringe the
copyright of anything). In the UK, you can't publish a (supposedly)
factual statement about another person which that person doesn't like
unless you can prove it. It's a little crazy but not overly hard to
work around; say "I don't believe Ray likes Lessig". It's primarily
invoked against the press.

> There *has* to be room for more than just "Ray wrote...".

Not particularly. The traditional method is to wait until they're dead
and forgotten, and their estate has disappeared.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: