Re: Let's stop feeding the NVidia cuckoo

[Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> wrote:

> Strictly yes, being mistaken is not an excuse. Just like if you
> discover that old versions of the package contained i386 binaries
> without source, the old versions are non-free. Also note that in both
> cases, they were *always* non-free (I really shouldn't have to explain
> this). The status has not changed, it's just that we weren't aware of
> it before.

Ok. If that JPEG was considered sufficiently modifiable in the absence
of the raw image, why is it not considered sufficiently modifiable in
the presence of it?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.legal@srcf.ucam.org