On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:35:11AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: [...] > But you do find a megabyte acceptable, as long as it's split up among > many different packages? [...] > Yes. I want my novella published, so I break it up into pieces, and > attach each piece to a different package; done. > > In the case of a proportional test, I must provide that much actual > work too (and benefit for the project), at the same time, for it to be > possible--that's a big hassle. Sounds like a good candidate for an exclusive exception. I am of the opinion that not explicitly talking about inclusive and exclusive exceptions in my proposal was an omission that should not have been made. You can be sure that I will address that issue in the next version of my proposal, if it isn't rendered irrelevant by an alternative amendment (see my discussions with Henning Makholm and Thomas Uwe Gruetmueller). Also see: Message-ID: <[🔎] 20011203044436.GB30855@deadbeast.net> Message-ID: <[🔎] 20011204175346.GA18335@deadbeast.net> Note that there are competing amendments, both of which I'd be happy with. You should probably speak up in favor of the one you support more. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | If encryption is outlawed, only branden@debian.org | outlaws will @goH7Ok=<q4fDj]Kz?. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpCNZYLaPC0h.pgp
Description: PGP signature