Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> writes:

> In addition to these outright offers to amend my proposal, I've
> considered several alternatives at length in many of mails on this
> subject.  I trust you don't the Message-ID's and quotes for those as
> well, but all you have to do is tell me I haven't and I'll oblige you.
> Because I rejected some alternatives, like "why not just not bother with
> any of this at all", or "why not just give the package maintainer
> complete discretion" doesn't mean I didn't consider them.

As yet, you haven't really said why you oppose a proportional system,
especially since it's easier to deliberately evade a fixed limit
system.