On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 07:01:26PM -0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 06:28:05PM -0800, Pann McCuaig wrote:
> My source hack sort of works. The problem is that the signature is appended
> *before* you start composing (so you can actually edit it), so my toggle
> idea in the compose menu doesn't really help so much.
You could bind a key or keys to set and unset the signature and then
toggle it with that.
TBH, I'd be more tempted to solve the problem in the editor than in mutt
- it seems easier and more appropriate to me. Either that or come up
with a signature that's generally applicable, I guess.
> > There is a mutt mailing list BTW, with many mutt gurus responding to
> > this sort of question all the time.
> Yeah, I had a look there first in the archives, but they didn't seem to
> address this particular aspect. I felt I should ask among my "own"
> Debianites before crossing over to them.
They're more likely to know than us. It's all about cooperation :-) .
> test sig
You don't want the sig as an attachment - it sshould be part of the body
of the message.
--
Mark Brown mailto:broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
EUFS http://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/
Attachment:
pgpWgzQPwfm1r.pgp
Description: PGP signature