On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 10:32:41PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 02:55:39AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > > And btw, help for bug triaging for any of those kind of packages is > > vastly appreciated... But here is a newsflash: 100 bugs is fairly easy > > to reduce. the 5 or 600 bugs the KDE team has closed was a year of work. > > Yes a damn year, during which there has been many upstream releases > > (getting a release ready is a week of work, plus the RC that always come > > with them, so you can add another week on top of this one). So please > > explain me how a team that has had sometimes less of 2 to 3 _actually active_ > > members at a given time do manage to keep up with bugs as well ? I'll > > tell you: they just don't. > > > > Sorry to seem pissed, but well, I am. Your mail (and others with the > > same thoughts) are completely disconnected from reality. Totally. > > > Sorry. I was arguing for the value of bug triage and communicating with > submitters. I still on't think that holding up migration over > unanswered bugs is a good idea. Hope that clears things up for you. The Debian would have KDE 3.1 (as we couldn't make it with KDE 3.5.5) and that would be a nightmare as it's now unsupported upstream. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgppgJ6AYbp0R.pgp
Description: PGP signature