Re: LILO

[Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>]

Peter Makholm wrote:

> Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org> writes:
>
> > importance. Until it is this way LILO is better because
> > it runs better in several archs (read: runs at all). And I noe see why
>
>
> You mean fewer archs, right?
>
> <quote source="/tmp/lilo-27.1.7/debian/control">
> Package: lilo
> Section: base
> Priority: important
> Architecture: i386
> </quote>
>
> Not even hurd-i386.
Yes, well, It wasn't a typo, I was just, er, wrong; I assumed blidnly 
that the quote from
the grub control file was meant to show that grub runned on fewer archs.
Stupid mistakes, since I know from experience that I have only used it 
to boot
i86 boxen.

Yours,

fsm

--
Frederico Munoz
fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org