Re: LILO
>>"Arthur" == Arthur Korn <arthur@korn.ch> writes:
Arthur> This would make boot-loader dependencies platform independent as
Arthur> well. Roussell should propose this on debian-policy, to make it
Arthur> an "official" virutal package. (I don't propse it myself in case
Arthur> you oppose Russell.)
The kernel-image packages already have a arch independent
means of *SUGGESTING* a boot loader package. If this is incorrect for
some arches, please let me know of what boot loader shall be
appropriate for the arch, and I shall ripple the changes through.
How come no one comments about the grub support in the images?
manoj
--
It is impossible for an optimist to be pleasantly surprised.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LILO
- From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
- References:
- LILO
- From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: LILO
- From: Robert van der Meulen <rvdm@cistron.nl>
- Re: LILO
- From: Arthur Korn <arthur@korn.ch>