Re: LILO
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:02:18PM +0100, Frederico Mu?oz wrote:
> Peter Makholm wrote:
>
> > Frederico Mu?oz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org> writes:
> > <quote source="/tmp/lilo-27.1.7/debian/control">
> > Package: lilo
> > Section: base
> > Priority: important
> > Architecture: i386
> > </quote>
> >
> > Not even hurd-i386.
> >
> Yes, well, It wasn't a typo, I was just, er, wrong; I assumed blidnly
> that the quote from
> the grub control file was meant to show that grub runned on fewer archs.
> Stupid mistakes, since I know from experience that I have only used it
> to boot
> i86 boxen.
Um, seeing as GRUB was written because the HURD people got pissed off at the
lack of a decent multiboot bootloader, I think it would support HURD just
fine. If there isn't any HURD version, I'd call that a build(d) failure, not
a GRUB failure.
--
Daniel Stone
daniel@kabuki.openfridge.net
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LILO
- From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
- References:
- LILO
- From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: LILO
- From: Robert van der Meulen <rvdm@cistron.nl>
- Re: LILO
- From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: LILO
- From: Roland Bauerschmidt <rb@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Itai Zukerman <zukerman@math-hat.com>
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Roland Mas <lolando@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net>
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>