Re: syslog_L 2
At 2002/3/26 10:01-0500 Joey Hess writes:
> Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> > So I think changing the testcase is the correct thing to do. Doing so
> > results in testcase 2 reporting a PASS and does not change the results
> > of any of the other testcases.
>
> Huh, I had hoped it would fix testcase 5 as well. Oh well, off to debug
> some more..
>
> Remember that the openloag_L test calls setlogmask in the same way. I'm
> not sure though if fixing that fixes any testcases.
Yes, changing this for openlog_L also changes the result
of "T.openlog_L 2" from FAIL to PASS.
Thanks for your help!
Chris
--
cyeoh@au.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-test-request@lists.linuxbase.org
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org
Reply to: