Re: syslog_L 2

To: lsb-test@lists.linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: syslog_L 2
From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 10:01:46 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020326150145.GA1649@kitenet.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 15520.28143.996901.660106@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
References: <[🔎] 20020326022726.GA2337@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 15519.57524.852321.29715@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <[🔎] 1020326113710.ZM22448@skye.rdg.opengroup.org> <[🔎] 15520.28143.996901.660106@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> So I think changing the testcase is the correct thing to do. Doing so
> results in testcase 2 reporting a PASS and does not change the results
> of any of the other testcases.

Huh, I had hoped it would fix testcase 5 as well. Oh well, off to debug
some more..

Remember that the openloag_L test calls setlogmask in the same way. I'm
not sure though if fixing that fixes any testcases.

-- 
see shy jo

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-test-request@lists.linuxbase.org
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: syslog_L 2
  - From: Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@samba.org>

References:
- syslog_L 2
  - From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
- Re: syslog_L 2
  - From: Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@samba.org>
- Re: syslog_L 2
  - From: Andrew Josey <ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org>
- Re: syslog_L 2
  - From: Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@samba.org>

Prev by Date: Re: tar: minor POSIX incompliance
Next by Date: Re: syslog_L 2
Previous by thread: Re: syslog_L 2
Next by thread: Re: syslog_L 2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread