Re: LSB-FHS2.2beta3 update

To: ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org (Andrew Josey)
Cc: lsb-test@linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: LSB-FHS2.2beta3 update
From: Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@samba.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 04:58:59 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 15200.26739.527309.850823@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1010726163931.ZM7968@skye.rdg.opengroup.org>
References: <[🔎] 1010726092334.ZM24268@skye.rdg.opengroup.org> <[🔎] 15200.16885.691826.364925@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <[🔎] 1010726163931.ZM7968@skye.rdg.opengroup.org>

Andrew Josey writes:
> Thanks. Fodder for the tomorrows update.
> Do you think we should put the effort in to renumber
> all the assertions to align with the FHS2.2 spec?

Hi Andrew,

Well it would be nice, but I don't consider it a high priority thing.
I find the description of what is being tested is good and the nature
of what is being tested in the FHS test suite makes it fairly easy to
determine what/why something is failing and correlate it with the
specification.

Regards,

Chris.
-- 
yeohc@au1.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia

Reply to:

References:
- LSB-FHS2.2beta3 update
  - From: Andrew Josey <ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org>
- Re: LSB-FHS2.2beta3 update
  - From: Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@samba.org>
- Re: LSB-FHS2.2beta3 update
  - From: Andrew Josey <ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org>

Prev by Date: Re: LSB-FHS2.2beta3 update
Next by Date: Question about Configuration
Previous by thread: Re: LSB-FHS2.2beta3 update
Next by thread: Re: LSB-FHS2.2beta3 update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread