Re: LSB-FHS2.2beta3 update

[Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@samba.org>]

Andrew Josey writes:
> All
> Another update is now available,
> at ftp://ftp.xopen.org/pub/lsb/test_suites/beta/
> 

Hi Andrew,

Thanks for the update. I think the following tests are incorrectly
returning the FAIL code instead of FIP:

520|40 1 17369 1 1|Reference 5.11.1-1(C)
520|40 1 17369 1 2|If the subsystem is supported
520|40 1 17369 1 3|The /var/spool/lpd directory exists and is searchable
520|40 1 17369 1 4|/var/spool/lpd: directory not found
520|40 1 17369 1 5|exit code 1 returned, expected 0
520|40 1 17369 1 6|This test result needs to be manually resolved
220|40 1 1 21:09:16|FAIL

520|40 2 17369 1 1|Reference 5.11.1-2(C)
520|40 2 17369 1 2|If the implementation has the lpd daemon running then
520|40 2 17369 1 3|The lock file /var/spool/lpd/lpd.lock exists
520|40 2 17369 1 4|/var/spool/lpd/lpd.lock: file not found
520|40 2 17369 1 5|exit code 1 returned, expected 0
520|40 2 17369 1 6|This test result needs to be manually resolved
220|40 2 1 21:09:16|FAIL

520|42 1 17721 1 1|Reference 5.11.2-1(C)
520|42 1 17721 1 2|If the subsystem is supported
520|42 1 17721 1 3|The /var/spool/rwho directory exists and is searchable
520|42 1 17721 1 4|/var/spool/rwho: directory not found
520|42 1 17721 1 5|exit code 1 returned, expected 0
520|42 1 17721 1 6|This test result needs to be manually resolved, returning FIP result
220|42 1 1 21:09:18|FAIL

Regards,

Chris.
-- 
yeohc@au1.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia