[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [gopher] Hello, world!



Scratch that.  I don't know what I was thinking.

On 30 December 2014 at 12:25, Nick Matavka <n.theodore.matavka.files@gmail.com> wrote:
I think a new goal should be added---standardising Gopher+.  I don't want to glut-ise Gopher like HTML has been, but I think that it's a feature that should be made official in the hopes of enhancing its usage.  I'm happy that Gopher development moves at a glacial pace---helps me keep up---but the Gopher+ spec is from nineteen-ninety-bloody-three and in my opinion it's time to make it a standard all bloody ready.

On 30 December 2014 at 12:15, Wolfgang Faust <wolfgangmcq@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:36 PM, James Mills
<prologic@shortcircuit.net.au> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Nick Matavka
> <n.theodore.matavka.files@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello, world!
>
>
> Hello Nick!
>
>
>>
>> Many years ago, I collaborated with several people (I have forgotten all
>> their names, but one of the contributors writes under the name Barana) on
>> this mailing list about the future of Gopher.  I eventually took the
>> initiative in creating a rough draft for a new Gopher RFC, and invited
>> comment, but no consensus was reached.  I believe that all the new features
>> Gopher has *mandate* an RFC; Gopher+, caps files, etc etc etc.
>>
>> I now believe that consensus *can* be established and therefore I
>> re-submit the same link.  Please edit it and comment to the best of your
>> ability.  I hope to actually submit this in the near future.
>>
>> http://piratepad.net/gopher
>
>
> I haven't quite read through this thoroughly yet. (Also I'm brand spanking
> new go Gopher!)
>
> Couple of questions:
>
> Is this a combination of the old Gopher protocol with
> inclusion of some of the GOpher+ ideas?
See the "Goals" section of the document for details, but it's
primarily intended to codify current practices and ad-hoc standards.
If it's not currently in common use, it doesn't belong in the
standard. For example, it covers:
* Several gophertypes not in the original RFC, including the
ubiquitous 'i' type.
* caps.txt and robots.txt files
* What clients and servers should do with the trailing fullstop on
menus and other text types (this still has some holes, I think--edits
welcome!)
* URL: selectors
* And more!

It is *not* intended to add even more features, unless they are
already in common use.

--
The views expressed above are exclusively mine, if anyone's.

_______________________________________________
Gopher-Project mailing list
Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project



--
       /^\/^\
       \----|
   _---'---~~~~-_  
    ~~~|~~L~|~~~~
       (/_  /~~--
     \~ \  /  /~
   __~\  ~ /   ~~----,
   \    | |       /  \  
   /|   |/       |    |
   | | | o  o     /~   |  
 _-~_  |        ||  \  /
(// )) | o  o    \\---'
//_- |  |          \
//   |____|\______\__\
~      |   / |    |
       |_ /   \ _|
     /~___|  /____\        



--
       /^\/^\
       \----|
   _---'---~~~~-_  
    ~~~|~~L~|~~~~
       (/_  /~~--
     \~ \  /  /~
   __~\  ~ /   ~~----,
   \    | |       /  \  
   /|   |/       |    |
   | | | o  o     /~   |  
 _-~_  |        ||  \  /
(// )) | o  o    \\---'
//_- |  |          \
//   |____|\______\__\
~      |   / |    |
       |_ /   \ _|
     /~___|  /____\        
_______________________________________________
Gopher-Project mailing list
Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project

Reply to: