Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 07:05:25PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: >>> So, how does cupt currently handle locally installed packages which >>> might have been rebuilt by users (which forgot to change the version >>> number)? >> If they are binary equivalent, they are merged. Otherwise non-local packages >> are thrown out with a warning. > > Uhm, I'm not sure this explain all the details. At some point, you'll > have to decide whether to keep a locally built package (and then > consider their dependencies) or to replace it with the "legacy" > package. Does your explanation mean that you always replace locally > built packages? No, fully contrary. The installed packages is parsed first, then all others. The other packages which have same version string but other hash sums are just throwed out of cache. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature