On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 08:33:49PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Cupt uniquely identifies the version entry by the pair (package_name,
> version). Hence, I disagree with adding some additional 'id's or something to
> the spec, it's ugly and not necessary IMO.
So, how does cupt currently handle locally installed packages which
might have been rebuilt by users (which forgot to change the version
number)? Are you able to decide whether they should be kept or not? Do
you reinstall them anyhow with the version from the archive?
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature