On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 07:05:25PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> > So, how does cupt currently handle locally installed packages which
> > might have been rebuilt by users (which forgot to change the version
> > number)?
> If they are binary equivalent, they are merged. Otherwise non-local packages
> are thrown out with a warning.
Uhm, I'm not sure this explain all the details. At some point, you'll
have to decide whether to keep a locally built package (and then
consider their dependencies) or to replace it with the "legacy"
package. Does your explanation mean that you always replace locally
built packages? (unless they've a different version of course).
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature