[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: hurd-i386 updates



On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:47:46PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Actualy, my k*BSD.cf files only contain kernel stuff. The Glibc-based
> GNU/k*BSD ports use gnu.cf directly (as Glibc systems this works fine).
> 
> Now that Michael has overhauled gnu.cf, my idea is to merge the (minor) k*BSD
> bits into a conditionalised section in gnu.cf, together with a bunch of
> conditionalised sections copied from linux.cf. This way we can get all
> Glibc-based ports to use the same base configuration.
> 
> As for non-Glibc ports, we will have to split the Debian bits out of gnu.cf
> into, say, debian.cf. Then both gnu.cf and NetBSD.cf can use that.
> 
> What do you people think?

I say do what you like, but keep in mind 1) that we no longer really have a
relationship with XFree86 upstream, at least when it comes to Imakefiles
and 2) no one other than XFree86 appears to be interested in retraining
Imake as a build system.

In other words, my ordinary caution about major overhauls in this part of
the tree is not engaged, but please don't spend time engineering a solution
for the ages, as the rest of the X community seems pretty interested in
making sure Imake doesn't live very much longer.

(Of course, it often happens that deprecating things doesn't always
actually make them go away...)

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    Nixon was so crooked that he needed
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    servants to help him screw his
branden@debian.org                 |    pants on every morning.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    -- Hunter S. Thompson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: