Re: proposed X Strike Force commit/changelog policy
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:30PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;)
> >
> > Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was
> > that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing,
> > not everything. The current xfree86 changelogs are massive, and we have
> > our revision control system to fully log everything. Plus, crediting
> > people right is a pain - what if two people work on something? Should
> > Branden be credited? How much contribution gets a credit? That sort of
> > thing. :)
>
> I think you are misremembering a little bit, or misapplying our
> agreement to the instant case.
>
> Here's my proposal for commit and changelog handling for the X Strike
> Force. These points are not very well organized because I'm writing
> this mail in a hurry. If there is agreement on these points I'll add
> them to the top-level README.
[SNIP]
It is more than fine for me.
Thanks
Fabio
--
Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol
"We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues
http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp00004.html
Reply to: