[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: proposed X Strike Force commit/changelog policy



[hurried reply]

On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:22:01PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> The goal is NOT to make the package changelogs less massive.  The goal
> is to make them more useful.  My package changelogs have been doing
> double-duty for years because I didn't have them under revision control.
> Now they simply need to do what a changelog should do -- log changes.

That's what I meant, really. Right now, some of the changelogs (like the
293-line changelog for 4.3.0-0ds4) are pretty unnavigable.

> Anyway, as to the point at issue, I don't think there is anything wrote
> with ISHIKAWA-san's update to debian/changelog.  It was a fairly
> important change to the build process.

My apologies for misunderstanding; I'm glad it's out in the clear now.

-- 
Daniel Stone 	     <daniel@raging.dropbear.id.au>             <dstone@kde.org>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org

Attachment: pgp41vZW6_cQN.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: