Re: xlibmesa naming and relationships
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 02:50:25PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> BTW, why is mesag3 not called libgl-mesa ? And i agree that the 3 is
> more confusing than something else.
The way I see it, people using mesa (instead of xlibmesa) have a reason
for that and renaming the package would make upgrades more difficult
(or make apt prefer xlibmesa over mesa). Since I agree that the "3" is
confusing, I'm probably end up having emtpy packages with the old names
-- for a release or two. The point is, I need 6 such empty packages...
--
Marcelo
Reply to: