Seth Arnold wrote:
Perhaps it is cutting out users who join the project with woody's original release. You don't fall into this category. You *can* install 3.3.6-11potato18 though, which is probably pretty damn close to the 3.3.6-18 you miss so much.
I feel like after giving a 'head's up' on my concern over utah and the X roadmap, that I shouldn't have to worry about deps going so far as to choose my X version.
Some of this relates to some of the main things I have critized debian for since I started using it a few years back. When I brought up concerns, I was dismissed. When I asked why I was dissmissed, I was told the old stand by "it's not supposed to work". Also the mentality that I *should have to repair the packages and shouldn't trust the packagers judgement. It is very infuriating over time... I can't believe that I should put all these packages I'm assumed to have on hold so often either.
Eh? Hmm. Maybe you forgot a 'not' somewhere in this sentence. Could you please rephrase that, and more directly apply it to your case of not putting the 3.3.6 packages on hold?
What I was saying is that some commerial applications in linux require utah. cheers, Terry -- --------------------------------------------------- | GooseEgg http://gooseegg.sourceforge.net | | QuakeForge http://www.quakeforge.net | | Personal http://www.westga.edu/~stu7440 | | | | Death is running Debian GNU/Linux | ---------------------------------------------------