Re: [mongoose@users.sourceforge.net: X upgrade policy]
>> Seth Arnold <sarnold@willamette.edu> writes:
> Terry, a few quick comments -- first, Utah-glx is in the past. While
> their work may have been nifty at one point, and for people running
> 3.3.x perhaps necessary, XF 4.0.1 has a *much* easier GL system.
Grmpf!
Do you know what DRI currently supports vs what Utah currently supports
in terms of hardware and/or features? I din't think so.
DRI's implementation is orders of magnitude cleaner and it *is* a
better option for some people (most of the people, probably), but
brushing Utah as a thing "in the past" is, at best, cluelessness. If
*you* had trouble setting up Utah drivers it doesn't mean that
*everyone* will have them.
--
Marcelo
Reply to: