Re: rman revisited
>> Branden Robinson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 10:39:29PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > A side note...
> > I get this with a Makefile freshly generated from a Imakefile:
> > $(RMAN) $(RMANOPTIONS) < Login.app.man >
> > Login.app.$(MANSUFFIX)-html &&\ $(MV)
> > Login.app.$(MANSUFFIX)-html $@
> > and since there's no Login.app.man, the compilation breaks. (If you
> > want to test this yourself, apt-get source login.app)
> Well, I presume it doesn't break if you apt-get install rman?
Well, I presume someone has to write the .man file in order for rman
to convert it?
There's a conditional en Imake.tmpl:
#define BuildHtmlManPages YES
#define BuildHtmlManPages NO
and BuildHtmlManPages is not defined anywhere else (that matters). I
guess I need to define BuildHtmlManPages as NO in site.def...
correction, I guess you need to define BuildHtmlManPages as NO in
site.def, the problem is compiling pacakges breaks unless the
maintainers add a .man file or a '#define BuildHtmlManPages' to their
BTW, shouldn't host.def be a conffile?