[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Outdated page was: Debian Dictionary

On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 07:42:07PM +0200, Jutta Wrage wrote:
> I contacted the address on the empty dict page some weeks ago and got 
> no answer.
> So as it die debian-www related, I think here is the right place to 
> discuss. Or must I file a bug against the Web page first?

Ok, some comments and questions on that issue:

First of all, this looks nice and promising to me. Could be useful to have.
Although I really don't like the page layout, but that's an secondary
issue (more details on this opinion on request).

The older project whith the same goals obviously never reached anything
other than the planning state ...

Q: Could you explain a bit how you do create these pages?
This is actually the important question to judge how and wether to
include it in the webpages.

Q: How do you like you this to be integrated in the webpages?
There are at least two distinct methods:
1) putting the code directly into the webpages' CVS and generate
them together with the pages.
2) putting the code into the DDP's CVS and include the generated
pages from there. IMHO this would be usefull if you want to have
different output formats and/or distribution methods (e.g. as debian

Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Reply to: