On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 04:33:22PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote: > Here are some suggested changes to the file. I only corrected for > spelling and grammar. I do have two questions though. Should we keep the Thanks, it was written hastily (sp?) > historical (not produced anymore) distros? Second, the section on Corel IMHO yes. It's important to know both what happens and what happened. We could probably, though, make a new list with "Historical distributions" and add them in. A good example of why we should keep this information is Corel: it seems they have created a new company to market Corel Linux with a new name. My reasons for including it is the same that drives us to keep updated the project_history document: don't forget what happened before (so we can learn for the future) > talks about KDE licensing issues. That doesn't seem relevant to > this page. Shouldn't it be removed? No, it's part of Corel's history. I say we keep it there. We could also talk about the "Open Source" issues (Corel did not contribute that much to Debian AFAIK, whileas Progeny still does). IMHO. Regards Javi
Attachment:
pgpVwFWbfGTHx.pgp
Description: PGP signature