Re: resource availability and (naive) ideas
- To: debian-women@lists.debian.org, weasel@debian.org, sgran@debian.org
- Subject: Re: resource availability and (naive) ideas
- From: Éric Araujo <merwok@netwok.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:07:47 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4C7EC0A3.1080108@netwok.org>
- In-reply-to: <20100831162933.GA7429@varinia.lobefin.net>
- References: <20100825171554.GA12027@upsilon.cc> <AANLkTikR==VGMo5qLgzbg9Boj9qLJRQnKUY_-hs70vyD@mail.gmail.com> <20100826120746.GC22573@upsilon.cc> <20100828013526.GA16114@erinn.org> <4C7A0766.7080708@debian.org> <20100831152845.GA25754@erinn.org> <20100831162933.GA7429@varinia.lobefin.net>
>> I've cc'd weasel and sgran so they can answer the following question: is
>> it acceptable to have non-DDs (and/or non-DMs) on such aliases?
>
> Yes, it's an alias file, so it can take arbitrary addresses.
I believe the question was about policy, not technique.
Regards
Reply to: